Corporate Migration: Why Companies Are Leaving Delaware for Nevada
In the first half of 2025, a wave of major corporations and investment firms announced plans to leave Delaware in favor of Nevada. From Silicon Valley tech firms to biotech startups and hedge funds, a growing list of companies is seeking shelter in the Silver State.
Why now? And what does it mean for corporate governance going forward?
Harvey AI's $5 Billion Valuation: What a Legal AI Unicorn Tells Us About Startup Hype, Venture Capital Strategy, and Market Reality
This week, legal AI startup Harvey announced a massive $300 million Series E financing, at a valuation of $5 billion.
To be clear, that number—five billion—is extraordinary. Harvey's $5 billion valuation represents a significant milestone in the legal AI space, especially considering Harvey closed $300 million in Series D financing in February (4 months ago) at a $3 billion valuation.
So what gives? Or is this another case of private market exuberance racing ahead of fundamentals? Let's break down how Harvey got here, what this valuation really means, and what it tells us about the broader startup and VC landscape.
We’re Not Just Losing Funding—We’re Losing the Future
The Trump administration’s move to slash funding to the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH)—the agencies that serve as the lifeblood of American scientific innovation—isn't just bad policy. It's a quiet, calculated demolition of our future.
My Response to Roman Iospa’s opinion piece — entitled “This isn’t a trade war — it’s tough love to save the future”
In Roman Iospa’s opinion piece — titled “This isn’t a trade war — it’s tough love to save the future,” Iospa claims that the global trade system is “broken,” and that Trump’s tariffs are necessary to prepare for a future defined by automation. As it pertains to the U.S. economy, Iospa’s thesis rests on several highly speculative assumptions that are discussed here.
📉 5 Reasons Why Intellectual Property Is More Important During Times of Economic Volatility
When markets turn uncertain, budgets tighten and leadership teams shift to survival mode. But for innovative companies, this is exactly when IP becomes a strategic weapon.
History shows that companies who double down on intellectual property during downturns often emerge stronger, more valuable, and more acquisition-ready than those who cut back.
Here are five reasons why IP protection should be at the top of your strategy during periods of economic volatility.
How Ukraine’s Lithium Reserves Could Determine the Future of AI and Energy Storage
With an estimated 500,000 tonnes of lithium, Ukraine's reserves are valued at approximately $15 trillion. Supporting Ukraine is not merely a matter of foreign policy but a strategic imperative for the United States. Ensuring U.S. access to critical minerals like lithium is essential for maintaining economic stability, advancing technological innovation, and preserving geopolitical influence.
The Future of the USPTO: Workforce Disruptions, Policy Shifts, and the Growing Backlog
Holding a patent is not merely a legal formality—it is a strategic asset that significantly enhances a company’s ability to secure funding and drive growth.all begins with an idea. While the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) faces unprecedented uncertainty as conflicting mandates on telework, hiring freezes, and return-to-office requirements disrupt operations, patent holders should expect more delays in patent prosecution as the USPTO backlog increases.
The Misguided Stance of the Copyright Office on AI-Generated Works
The U.S. Copyright Office has taken the position that AI image generating tools, like MidJourney, (not the user using the tool) are the authors of the images that are created. The best example we have is the case of Kristina Kashtanova’s graphic novel, Zarya of the Dawn, which was partially generated using AI. The Copyright Office’s reasoning is flawed, and the issue of who the author is when using AI tools needs careful examination.